Go Back
Home
/
Vivekananda Timeline
/
To Ridgley Manor (Apr 1895)
To Ridgley Manor (Apr 1895)
Total Records Found: 17
13 Apr 1895
CE
Swamiji arrived in Ridgley Manor (ND 3. 076)
14 Apr 1895
CE
Swamiji was invited by Mr. Leggett to stay at Ridgly manor. (ND 3. 076)
Apr 1895
CE
About Ridgely Manor. (ND 3. 078)
Apr 1895
CE
This was Swamiji's first visit to Ridgely. (ND 3. 078)
Apr 1895
I
It was probably in connection with this much needed vacation that two stories were told in later years by Miss MacLeod, both of which illustrate Swamiji's recovery his rested, relaxed, and playful mood. They come down to us not through her reminiscences, but through the swamis at Belur Math to whom she told them. (ND 3. 079)
Apr 1895
I
Another incident at Ridgely related by Hollister. (ND 3. 080)
Apr 1895
CE
In the second week of April the Swami went on invitation to Mr. Leggett's country home; Ridgely Manor on the Hudson River in New York State, for about two weeks. The trip did him good; he enjoyed the countryside and the mountains, and Mr. Leggett's large estate. (LSV 2. 014)
14 Apr 1895
Notes
In reply, Landsberg wrote on April 14 pouring out his heart, recounting his grievances, and justifying the action he was about to take. One difficulty had been the matter of eating at home. (ND 3.066)
14 Apr 1895
Notes
Swamiji bore his disciple's outbursts with equanimity. (ND 3.067)
Apr 1895
Notes
Reading this letter-both what is written and what lies between those meticulously penned lines--one tends to think with Mrs. Bull that the problem was indeed Landsberg himself. (ND 3.067)
16 Apr 1895
S
In a letter from Mrs. Bull to Mary Hale, dated April 16, one finds his own comments on his reply to Mrs. McKeen. Mrs. Bull wrote in part: (ND 2.315)
Apr 1895
News reports
To its credit, the Eagle did indeed print Dr. Janes's article, and this with a prominent heading: (ND 2.315)
Apr 1895
News reports
Dr. Lewis G. Janes's Reply to Mrs. James McKeen - APPENDIX D (ND 2.315 also ND 2.422)
Apr 1895
Analysis
Dr. Janes's well-documented and irrefutable article was an essential piece of work, without which the controversy with Mts.' McKeen and the Ramabai Circle would have been inconclusive and, to say the least, confusing. (ND 2.321)
19 Apr 1895
CE
As for Landsberg, he moved to a lodging house at 228 West Thirty-ninth Street on Friday, April 19. (ND 3.075)
19 Apr 1895
0
Landsberg moved out of Swamiji's apartment on 33 St. to not to cause him further inconvenience on his behalf (ND)
23 Apr 1895
CE
Swamiji returned to his lodgings in New York on April 23. (ND 3. 081)
Suggest a correction